Protecting Megan: Legal Team Seeks Permanent Injunction Against Online Harassment
Megan Thee Stallion's legal team is seeking further legal action against online commentator Milagro Gramz, alleging ongoing harassment and cyberstalking. They are requesting a permanent injunction to prevent Gramz from targeting the rapper online through written and spoken commentary on digital platforms. Despite a recent jury ruling in Megan's favor, her legal team claims that Gramz has continued to engage in disparaging and retaliatory behavior, as evidenced by various incidents post-verdict.
Gramz's actions, including an Instagram Live session where she downplayed the court's decision and made dismissive remarks about the lawsuit loss, have been cited as examples of her intent to cause harm while invoking First Amendment protections. Additionally, her alleged mocking of Megan's emotional distress and references to the rapper's past interview with journalist Gayle King have been highlighted as further instances of harmful behavior.
The motion also points to Gramz's appearance on another blogger's livestream, where she reportedly made new accusations against Megan and trial witnesses, including accusations of perjury and racially charged characterizations. Gramz's attempts to shift blame onto Megan's manager and her crowdfunding efforts to offset damages awarded by the jury are cited as evidence of her avoidance of consequences while continuing her harmful actions.
Megan's legal team argues that Gramz's conduct is rooted in retaliation and serves no legitimate purpose other than to damage the rapper's reputation, livelihood, and emotional well-being. They emphasize the need for a permanent injunction to halt the ongoing online attacks, which they believe are aimed at punishing Megan for her cooperation with law enforcement and surviving a shooting involving someone connected to Gramz. The motion concludes that a permanent injunction is necessary to protect Megan from further harm disguised as commentary.