Federal Judges Acknowledge AI Errors in Court Orders: Strengthening Review Processes
Two federal judges have admitted that their staff used artificial intelligence to help prepare recent court orders that were deemed to be error-ridden. U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate in Mississippi and U.S. District Judge Julien Xavier Neals in New Jersey acknowledged that the decisions did not undergo their chambers' typical review processes before being issued. Both judges have implemented measures to enhance the review of rulings following the incidents.
Judge Neals revealed that a draft decision in a securities lawsuit was released in error due to human error and was withdrawn promptly once the mistake was identified. He mentioned that a law school intern utilized OpenAI's ChatGPT for research without proper authorization or disclosure. Neals' chambers have since established a written AI policy and improved their review process to prevent similar errors in the future.
In a separate incident, Judge Wingate disclosed that a law clerk in his court used Perplexity as a drafting assistant to synthesize publicly available information on the docket. He acknowledged that posting the draft decision was a result of a lapse in human oversight. Wingate replaced the original order in a civil rights lawsuit after initially attributing the errors to clerical mistakes.
Following inquiries from U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, the judges addressed the use of AI in their decisions after concerns were raised about factual inaccuracies and errors by lawyers in the cases. Grassley commended the judges for acknowledging the mistakes and emphasized the importance of the judiciary adopting stronger AI guidelines to ensure fair treatment under the law.
In recent years, lawyers have faced increased scrutiny from judges for potential misuse of AI, leading to fines or sanctions in numerous cases. The judiciary is urged to uphold litigants' rights and prevent violations through the responsible use of generative AI technology. It is essential for federal judges and the judiciary as a whole to prioritize fairness and accuracy in legal proceedings.
Discovering investment opportunities can be challenging, especially with thousands of stocks to consider. Smart investors leverage tools like the Stock Screener, which offers predefined screens and customizable filters to uncover hidden gems quickly. From methods like Piotroski's Picks for financial strength to Momentum Masters for stocks gaining traction, the Stock Screener provides valuable insights for investors. Explore screens for dividends, growth, value, and more to identify overlooked opportunities in the market. Check out the Under $10/share screen, ideal for finding stocks trading below $10 with recent price momentum and impressive returns.